0000161: Dependent tasks: changes in duration are not correctly applied to dependent tasks - MantisBT

2020-07-13 17:19 PDT

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ]

[ Issue History ] [ Print ]

ID

Project

Category

View Status

Date Submitted

Last Update

0000161

Pending Requests

[All Projects] General

public

2009-05-15 05:38

2011-08-13 22:21

Reporter

jortigosa

Assigned To

Priority

normal

Severity

major

Reproducibility

always

Status

closed

Resolution

duplicate

Product Version

Target Version

Fixed in Version

Summary

0000161: Dependent tasks: changes in duration are not correctly applied to dependent tasks

Description

Task 2 depends on Task 1 with the "Set task start date based on dependency " tick, therefore Task 2 starting date depends on finish of task 1.

When the duration of task 1 is increased, start date of task 2 is shitfed to the furture. This is correct.
If duration of task 1 is decreased, task 2 does not get shifted to an earlier start.
In fact, if Task 2 is "edited", the tick of "Set task start date based on dependency" is always deselected, even if Task 2 was saved with the tick selected.

Tags

No tags attached.

Attached Files

Relationships

duplicate of	0000162	closed	caseydk	Pending Requests	Should task dependencies cascade to earlier dates?
duplicate of	0000163	new		Pending Requests	Tracking Start Dates & Dependencies
related to	0000078	closed	trevormorse	v2.4 Release (Closed)	Task dependencies not cascading

Relationships

Notes
~0000280 jortigosa (reporter) 2009-05-15 05:41	Sorry, but I think this issue is just a "duplicate" of BIG ISSUE 0078. I should have read throughly all the issues before reporting.

~0000282 caseydk (administrator) 2009-05-15 07:56 Last edited: 2009-05-15 08:05	This is not an exact duplicate of 0000078 but similar: "If duration of task 1 is decreased, task 2 does not get shifted to an earlier start." - Please follow this issue under 0000162. "In fact, if Task 2 is "edited", the tick of "Set task start date based on dependency" is always deselected, even if Task 2 was saved with the tick selected." - Please follow this issue under 0000163.

~0002145 caseydk (administrator) 2011-08-13 22:21	Closing this one in favor of the two related issues that describe each half of the problem separately.

Notes

Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
Issue History
2009-05-15 05:38	jortigosa	New Issue
2009-05-15 05:41	jortigosa	Note Added: 0000280
2009-05-15 07:56	caseydk	Note Added: 0000282
2009-05-15 08:00	caseydk	Relationship added	related to 0000078
2009-05-15 08:03	caseydk	Relationship added	parent of 0000162
2009-05-15 08:03	caseydk	Relationship added	parent of 0000163
2009-05-15 08:04	caseydk	Project	v1.0 Release (Closed) => Pending Requests
2009-05-15 08:05	caseydk	Note Edited: 0000282
2009-09-12 09:45	pedroa	Status	new => assigned
2009-09-12 09:45	pedroa	Assigned To	=> pedroa
2010-06-15 09:41	caseydk	Status	assigned => new
2010-06-15 09:43	caseydk	Assigned To	pedroa =>
2011-08-13 22:19	caseydk	Relationship replaced	related to 0000162
2011-08-13 22:20	caseydk	Relationship replaced	duplicate of 0000162
2011-08-13 22:20	caseydk	Relationship replaced	duplicate of 0000163
2011-08-13 22:21	caseydk	Note Added: 0002145
2011-08-13 22:21	caseydk	Status	new => closed
2011-08-13 22:21	caseydk	Resolution	open => duplicate

Issue History