Anonymous Login
2022-10-05 18:52 PDT

View Issue Details Jump to Notes ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0000331v1.2 Release (Closed)[All Projects] Generalpublic2010-01-06 19:52
Assigned Tocaseydk 
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version1.2.1 
Summary0000331: Contact edit form is blank
DescriptionIt appears after solving this issue
Now I can edit contact after installing. But the next time, when I want change sth - form is blank although data in profile summary are displayed correctly.
Attached Files




caseydk (administrator)

Which form is empty? The contact info form itself?


KrzysztofKamil (reporter)

Yep. All of fields in contact form are empty.


caseydk (administrator)

I've been trying to duplicate this one and I'm not getting it... could you provide all the steps? Thanks.


KrzysztofKamil (reporter)

So, step by step.
1. Clean install of w2p v1.2 with fix that you pointed me on the board.
2. I put my info into form, the most important of them (name, e-mail, IM, country, job title, displayed name).
3. Save the info.
4. Now everything is displayed correctly at the contact page.
5. When I want edit info, it seems that script didn't get info from database. Form fields are blank.
IMO script of editing contact has problems with reading database. Maybe it's about some incorrect settings in DB, there appears few during installation...


caseydk (administrator)

Still not able to reproduce this one. Has anyone else duplicated this?


engral (reporter)

similar problem for me after modifying script according
form is blank


KrzysztofKamil (reporter)

Last edited: 2009-12-26 19:44

Finally! Someone has the same ugly bug!
Sorry, engral ;)

Hmm... I noticed that form is OK, if I opening somebody with granted manager role.
ACL for this role I described in the first post (x_manager) at
But if open contact of somebody with "x_worker" role, form fields are blank.

I forgot to mention before that I've got one custom fields in contacts.


engral (reporter)

Hello KrzysztofKamil.
I don't understand your answer because my bad english...
But it seem's to be OK with
I'll try it soon on my server.


KrzysztofKamil (reporter)

OK. Write if it would works.


caseydk (administrator)

Resolved this one in r900;
The permissions check was exactly opposite of what it should have been... this fix will be in the v1.2.1 release;


caseydk (administrator)

In v1.2.1 release.

-Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2009-12-14 03:08 KrzysztofKamil New Issue
2009-12-14 03:32 caseydk Note Added: 0000650
2009-12-14 03:36 KrzysztofKamil Note Added: 0000651
2009-12-17 22:09 caseydk Assigned To => caseydk
2009-12-17 22:09 caseydk Severity minor => major
2009-12-17 22:09 caseydk Status new => assigned
2009-12-17 22:10 caseydk Project Pending Requests => v1.2 Release (Closed)
2009-12-19 17:36 caseydk Note Added: 0000672
2009-12-20 06:04 KrzysztofKamil Note Added: 0000678
2009-12-23 21:06 caseydk Note Added: 0000683
2009-12-26 16:01 engral Note Added: 0000693
2009-12-26 19:37 KrzysztofKamil Note Added: 0000694
2009-12-26 19:44 KrzysztofKamil Note Edited: 0000694
2009-12-27 09:17 engral Note Added: 0000696
2009-12-27 12:15 KrzysztofKamil Note Added: 0000698
2009-12-29 20:38 caseydk Status assigned => resolved
2009-12-29 20:38 caseydk Resolution open => fixed
2009-12-29 20:38 caseydk Note Added: 0000702
2010-01-06 19:52 caseydk Note Added: 0000730
2010-01-06 19:52 caseydk Status resolved => closed
2010-01-06 19:52 caseydk Fixed in Version => 1.2.1
2010-04-05 23:57 ronaldo_ronaldo Tag Attached: r900
+Issue History